The structurally normal heart pumps an equal volume of blood to the pulmonary and systemic circulations with the volume of blood leaving the heart from the left side equaling the volume of blood returning to the right. The balance of pulmonary and systemic blood flow (Qp:Qs) is therefore equal to 1.i
Cardiac Output (CO) = pulmonary blood flow (Qp) + systemic blood flow (Qs)
Qp : Qs = 1
In the presence of specific anatomical anomalies, the pulmonary and systemic circulations operate with physiological overlap, effectively functioning in parallel rather than in series. Consequently, the distribution of cardiac output to each circuit is not fixed but is dynamically determined by the relative vascular resistance in the pulmonary and systemic vascular beds.
Therefore, for any given cardiac output, a rise in pulmonary blood flow will mean a reduction in systemic blood flow and vice versa. In the newborn, systemic vascular resistance is relatively high and pulmonary vascular resistance, which is initially high, falls steadily over the first few weeks of life.
When the balance of blood flow shifts towards either pulmonary or systemic, there will be significant and likely detrimental effects for the patient as described below.
Each patient will have unique variations which will affect their physiology and responses to management strategies. There is no “one size fits all” strategy for each condition.
Pulmonary Over Perfusion
Pulmonary over perfusion (Qp>Qs) is rare in the newborn due to innate high pulmonary vascular resistance following birth but can occur with some lesions and ratios >1.5:1 may cause the following complications:
- Respiratory distress in a pink baby (‘high’ saturations).
- Lactic acidosis (due to systemic tissue under perfusion)
- Hypotension and wide pulse pressure
- Hepatic, renal failure and multi-organ failure
- Death
Pulmonary Under Perfusion
Pulmonary under perfusion (Qp<Qs) may occur with pulmonary hypertension or certain obstructive lesions and can be tolerated to a degree but ratios of >1:1.5 may cause the following:
- Profound cyanosis (‘low’ saturations).
- Lactic acidosis (due to tissue hypoxia)
- Normo/Hypotension with narrow pulse pressure
- Death
Careful monitoring is required to identify any decompensation in the unbalanced circulation. However, it is vital to understand that the relationship between arterial oxygen saturations (SaO2) or mixed venous saturations (SvO2) and oxygen delivery (DO2) are not linear.
Optimal Oxygen Delivery
Our goal for managing these patients is to optimise oxygen delivery to tissues. Due to the balancing act of resistances within systemic and pulmonary vascular circulation, it is not as easy as aiming for higher saturations and normal blood pressure. The following are some illustrations to highlight the challenges and guide management decisions.
Arterial Oxygen Saturations vs. Oxygen Delivery
This model of a univentricular circulation (Figure 4) suggests that optimal tissue oxygen delivery occurs at around SaO2 60-70% with rapid reduction in oxygen delivery with saturations >75%. This is because the high pulmonary blood flow required to achieve high SaO2 compromises systemic perfusion. Conversely, babies with relatively low arterial saturations may have better tissue oxygen delivery.ii A saturation target of 60-70% is rarely recommended, and individual targets should be sought from named or on-call cardiologist.

This theoretical model demonstrates that for any given saturation an optimisation of cardiac output can dramatically increase tissue oxygen delivery and that higher oxygen saturations can have a rapidly detrimental effect on tissue oxygen delivery.
Consider inotropic support, respiratory support and sedation to achieve adequate systemic blood flow and optimise cardiac output.
Venous Saturations vs. Oxygen Delivery
The relationship between venous saturations (SvO2) and tissue oxygen delivery are also complex in balanced circulations. Measuring true venous saturations in balanced circulations (via UVC) is not practical and is not commonly done. The use of Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring allows an approximation of regional tissue saturations which can be monitored in real time (see below).
Venous oxygen saturation >30% is required to sustain aerobic metabolism essential for metabolic functions.
Arterial-Venous Oxygen Difference
Since infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease do not have normal arterial oxygen saturations, a simpler way to consider the relationship between SaO2 and tissue oxygen delivery would be to consider the Arterial-Venous Oxygen Difference (A-VO2)

Optimal tissue oxygen delivery occurs when the A-VO2 is between 10-20%
Optimal tissue oxygen delivery occurs when the A-VO2 is between 10-20% yet this simple value does not take into account the cardiac output state of the baby and as table 2 demonstrates this can lead to misinterpretation of clinical status of the baby based solely on saturations.

Do not rely on saturations alone (regional and arterial) as a single indicator of the clinical status of the baby.
NIRS Monitoring
In clinical practice, it may be easier to consider the difference between arterial saturations (SaO2) and regional saturations (rSO2) using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). This can be expressed as Fractional Tissue Oxygen Extraction (FTOE) - a rising index is consistent with inadequate tissue oxygen delivery:

Data taken from animal studies determined that:
- HyperoxiaFTOE is indicated with FTOE ≤ 0.1
- NormoxiaFTOE a FTOE > 0.1 and ≤0.4
- HypoxiaFTOE a FTOE > 0.4
A real-time measure of A-VO2 can be estimated using pulse oximetry and regional NIRS saturations (SpO2 – rSO2). A typical arterial venous difference is 10%-20% and rising gaps should prompt clinical review. More information on NIRS monitoring can be found in the NIRS guideline on the perinatal network website. When interpreting NIRS it is important to remember that there isn’t an absolute normal value but it is vital to follow trends. Arterial blood should always have the highest oxygen saturation (SaO2) but for regional saturations the renal beds (rSO2R) have the highest saturations (high blood flow and low metabolic demands) followed by cerebral saturations (rSO2C) and venous saturations (SvO2).
The following rules of thumb are useful:

Note: Using the Invos Somanetic neonatal probe the lower limit of normal for cerebral saturation is considered to be 63%. Absolute NIRS values vary with different manufacturer probes. Check relevant documentation locally for these values.

Physiology Summary
- An unbalanced circulation >1.5:1 in either direction, pulmonary or systemic can have significant physiological effects and should be avoided
- An assessment to determine the balance of a circulation should include measurements of SaO2, SpO2 and rSO2 if available and should be considered in all babies with significant congenital heart disease or a large PDA.
- Saturations do not indicate cardiac output state of the baby and using other markers (Blood and pulse pressure, urine output, peripheral perfusion, lactate) should also form part of the regular assessment