Key roles
- Authors: Service Leads or designated service contacts responsible for drafting referral guidance.
- Reviewers: Referral Advisors who collaborate with services to reach consensus.
- Approvers: GP Subcommittee and Medicine Advisory Group (MAG), where guidance requires clinical oversight or references medicine.
Clinical review at publication
Referral guidance is reviewed collaboratively by Referral Advisors and the relevant services. The GP Subcommittee and MAG provide formal clinical oversight and approval prior to publication.
Review and updating arrangements
All content is reviewed a standard of every two years unless specified by the service. Automated RDS alerts notify the RefGuide Team, who contact authors three months prior to the review date. Updated guidance is re-reviewed by Referral Advisors and, if clinical or GP-impacting changes occur, it is processed through the full governance pathway.
Systematic sourcing and evidence evaluation
Many pathways are derived directly from national sources, including the Centre for Sustainable Delivery, SIGN, and Scottish Cancer Guidelines. Where applicable, original sources are linked within the pathway.
Local pathways are developed collaboratively between Primary and Secondary Care services. Consensus-based to ensure clinical appropriateness and alignment with current best practice and subject to governance and quality assurance by the GP Subcommittee and MAG.