Patients with prostate cancer who are candidates for radical treatment should have the opportunity to discuss the range of treatment modalities and their serious side effects in relation to their treatment options with a specialist surgical oncologist and a specialist clinical oncologist, all of whom should bear in mind the principles of realistic medicine.
Criteria
Any person who has a life expectancy of 10 years or more who presents with non-metastatic prostate cancer can be offered treatment with a curative intent. The assessment of life expectancy can be difficult and should be based on co-morbidities rather than simply age at presentation. Useful resources for assessing and counselling patients considering radical prostatectomy include the PREDICT Prostate tool
and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) Nomogram
.
Risk stratification is based on the Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG)
criteria.
1. For people with Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) 1 (and some with CPG2) localised prostate cancer:
- Offer active surveillance as preferred option.
- Consider radical prostatectomy or radical radiotherapy if active surveillance is not suitable or acceptable to the person.
2. For people with CPG 2/3 localised prostate cancer:
- Offer radical prostatectomy or radical radiotherapy and
- Consider active surveillance for people who choose not to have immediate radical treatment.
3. For people with CPG 4 and 5 localised and locally advanced prostate cancer:
- Do not offer active surveillance.
- Offer radical prostatectomy or radical radiotherapy to people in this cohort where it is likely the person's cancer can be controlled in the long term, accepting that their risk of needing a second line treatment is higher.
- Whilst there is no evidence of long term benefit of pre-operative treatment with LHRH agonists or antagonists, where surgical waiting times exceed 3 months then use of these agents may be discussed with the patient.